Genetic Engineering, GM Crops, Gene Editing and Vaccines
Recombinant DNA, Bt cotton and GM mustard, GEAC regulation, CRISPR and genome-edited crops, and vaccine platforms from live attenuated to mRNA — for UPSC.
SyllabusGS III · Awareness in the field of bio-technology; developments in science and technology and their applications in health and agriculture
Prerequisites: Biotechnology and Health — overview · Agriculture and Food Security
The Hook: A Mustard Seed Splits the Supreme Court
In October 2022, the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) cleared the environmental release of GM mustard hybrid DMH-11, developed at the University of Delhi. Petitioners challenged the decision. On 23 July 2024, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a split verdict on its validity, and the matter went to a larger bench — but both judges directed the Centre to frame a national policy on GM crops after consulting stakeholders.
A single crop thus raised every question this topic answers: what does genetic engineering actually do to a plant, who decides whether it is safe, and how should India weigh yields against biosafety and farmers’ choices?
The Core Concept
Biotechnology is the use of living organisms, cells or their parts to make products or solve problems. Brewing and curd-making are old biotechnology; modern biotechnology begins with the ability to cut, copy and move genes.
How recombinant DNA technology works (in one paragraph)
Restriction enzymes act as “molecular scissors” that cut DNA at specific sequences. The gene of interest is cut out of the donor organism and pasted into a carrier, or vector — usually a bacterial plasmid — using the enzyme DNA ligase (“molecular glue”). The recombinant plasmid is introduced into a host (often the bacterium E. coli, or a plant cell via Agrobacterium), which copies the gene and makes its protein. Cells that took up the gene are picked out with selectable markers. Human insulin made this way became the first recombinant DNA drug, approved in 1982.
graph LR
A[Isolate DNA from donor] --> B[Cut gene with restriction enzyme]
B --> C[Insert into plasmid vector with ligase]
C --> D[Introduce into host cell]
D --> E[Select transformed cells]
E --> F[Host expresses the new protein or trait]Applications at a glance
| Field | Applications |
|---|---|
| Agriculture | Insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant crops; biofortified crops (Golden Rice with beta-carotene); tissue culture; marker-assisted breeding |
| Medicine | Recombinant insulin, vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy, diagnostics such as RT-PCR |
| Industry and environment | Enzymes, biofuels, bioplastics, bioremediation of oil spills and heavy metals |
| Forensics | DNA fingerprinting for criminal investigation and paternity |
GM crops in India
| Crop | Trait and gene | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Bt cotton | Insect resistance — cry genes from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bollgard: cry1Ac; Bollgard II: cry1Ac + cry2Ab) | Approved in 2002; now dominates India’s cotton area |
| Bt brinjal | Resistance to fruit and shoot borer | Cleared by GEAC in 2009; moratorium imposed in February 2010. Bangladesh grows it commercially |
| GM mustard (DMH-11) | Hybrid vigour through the barnase–barstar male-sterility system, plus the bar gene (tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate, used as a marker) | Environmental release approved in October 2022; under challenge in the Supreme Court |
How Bt works: the bacterium makes the Cry protein as an inactive protoxin. In the alkaline gut of a caterpillar it becomes active, binds to the gut lining and punches pores in it, killing the larva. Mammalian guts are acidic and lack the receptors, which is why the toxin is considered safe for humans.
Who regulates GM organisms
India regulates GM organisms under the Rules for the Manufacture, Use, Import, Export and Storage of Hazardous Micro-organisms, Genetically Engineered Organisms or Cells, 1989, framed under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
| Body | Ministry | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBSC) | At each research institution | First-level oversight of lab work |
| Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) | Department of Biotechnology | Approves research and contained field trials |
| Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) | Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change | Approves large-scale use and environmental release |
| State Biotechnology Coordination Committees / District Level Committees | States / districts | Monitoring and enforcement |
Internationally, India is a party to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (adopted 2000, in force 2003) under the Convention on Biological Diversity, which governs the safe transboundary movement of living modified organisms.
Gene editing — the next step
CRISPR-Cas9 is a gene-editing tool adapted from a bacterial immune system. A short guide RNA leads the Cas9 enzyme to a matching DNA sequence, where it makes a cut; the cell’s own repair process then disables, corrects or replaces the gene. Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna received the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for it.
| Category | What happens | Foreign DNA in final product? | India’s regulatory treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDN-1 | Cut and natural repair — small random changes (often a gene knock-out) | No | Exempted from the 1989 Rules (MoEFCC, March 2022) if free of exogenous DNA |
| SDN-2 | Cut and repair using a small template — a specific, intended edit | No | Exempted, as above |
| SDN-3 | Insertion of a whole gene, possibly from another species | Yes | Regulated like a GM organism |
The logic of the 2022 exemption: SDN-1 and SDN-2 changes are similar to those produced by conventional breeding or natural mutation. In May 2025, ICAR released two genome-edited rice varieties — DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala) and Pusa DST Rice 1 — developed with this approach.
In medicine, the first approved CRISPR therapy, Casgevy, was cleared in the UK (November 2023) and the USA (December 2023) for sickle cell disease and beta-thalassaemia. India launched the National Sickle Cell Anaemia Elimination Mission in July 2023, with the goal of eliminating the disease as a public health problem by 2047.
Vaccines — platforms you must know
A vaccine shows the immune system a harmless version or part of a pathogen so that it remembers it.
| Platform | How it works | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Live attenuated | Weakened living pathogen | Oral polio vaccine, MMR, BCG |
| Inactivated | Killed whole pathogen | Injectable polio vaccine; Covaxin (Bharat Biotech with ICMR) |
| Subunit / recombinant protein | Only a protein of the pathogen | Hepatitis B; HPV vaccines; Corbevax (Biological E) |
| Toxoid | Inactivated toxin | Tetanus, diphtheria |
| Viral vector | A harmless virus carries the antigen gene | Covishield (Oxford–AstraZeneca, chimpanzee adenovirus vector) |
| mRNA | mRNA instructs cells to make the antigen; it does not enter the nucleus or alter DNA | Pfizer–BioNTech, Moderna |
| DNA | Plasmid DNA carries the antigen gene | ZyCoV-D (Zydus) — the world’s first DNA vaccine for humans, approved for emergency use in India in August 2021 |
Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman received the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for nucleoside base modifications that made mRNA vaccines practical.
Other health biotechnology
- Stem cells — undifferentiated cells that can renew themselves and become specialised cells. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent; induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are made by reprogramming adult cells (Shinya Yamanaka, Nobel Prize 2012).
- Gene therapy — correcting a defective gene inside a patient’s cells, either outside the body (ex vivo) or inside it (in vivo).
- CAR-T cell therapy — a patient’s T-cells are engineered to recognise and kill cancer cells. NexCAR19, developed by ImmunoACT with IIT Bombay, was approved by India’s drug regulator in 2023 as the first indigenous CAR-T therapy.
India’s status
- Department of Biotechnology (1986) under the Ministry of Science and Technology; BIRAC supports biotech start-ups.
- The BioE3 Policy (Biotechnology for Economy, Environment and Employment), approved in August 2024, promotes biomanufacturing in areas such as bio-based chemicals, smart proteins, precision biotherapeutics and climate-resilient agriculture.
- The Genome India Project (DBT) set out to sequence 10,000 genomes from across India’s population groups.
- India is a major vaccine manufacturer; during COVID-19 it ran the CoWIN-based vaccination drive and supplied vaccines abroad under Vaccine Maitri.
Issues
- Biosafety: gene flow to wild relatives, effects on pollinators and soil organisms, resistance in pests (pink bollworm has developed resistance to Bt cotton).
- Herbicide-tolerant crops: concern about weedicide overuse and loss of farm labour; illegal HTBt cotton has been reported.
- Seed sovereignty and cost: dependence on proprietary seed and trait fees; farmers’ rights under the PPV&FR Act, 2001.
- Regulatory trust: the GEAC’s independence, transparency of biosafety data, and the role of States (agriculture is a State subject).
- Ethics: human germline editing, consent, genetic privacy and equitable access to costly gene therapies.
Memory Anchors
rDNA toolkit: “Scissors, Glue, Vehicle, Home” → restriction enzyme, ligase, vector, host.
GM crop timeline: “02 – 10 – 22” → Bt cotton approved (2002), Bt brinjal moratorium (2010), GM mustard release (2022).
SDN ladder: 1 = cut, 2 = correct, 3 = carry in a new gene. Only the third carries foreign DNA, so only the third is treated as GM.
| Confusable pair | Difference |
|---|---|
| GEAC vs RCGM | GEAC (MoEFCC) — environmental release; RCGM (DBT) — research and trials |
| GM vs genome-edited (SDN-1/2) | GM inserts foreign DNA; SDN-1/2 edits the plant’s own DNA |
| Viral-vector vs mRNA | Vector uses a harmless virus as the carrier; mRNA uses a lipid nanoparticle |
| Covaxin vs Covishield | Inactivated whole virus vs adenovirus vector |
For Prelims
- Bt toxin is a protoxin activated in the alkaline gut of insect larvae.
- GEAC sits under MoEFCC; its legal base is the 1989 Rules under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
- DMH-11 uses the barnase–barstar system; the bar gene confers glufosinate tolerance.
- SDN-1 and SDN-2 genome-edited plants free of foreign DNA were exempted from the 1989 Rules in 2022.
- ZyCoV-D — first DNA vaccine for humans (2021); Covaxin — inactivated; Covishield — viral vector.
- CRISPR — Nobel Chemistry 2020; mRNA base modification — Nobel Medicine 2023; iPSCs — Nobel Medicine 2012.
For Mains
- Dimensions: food and nutrition security; farm incomes and input costs; biosafety and the precautionary principle; federalism (States’ role in agriculture); trade (GM-free export markets); ethics of human gene editing; affordability of new therapies.
- Keywords: precautionary principle, biosafety dossier, gene flow, refugia, trait value, seed sovereignty, product-based vs process-based regulation, biomanufacturing.
- Value-addition: Supreme Court split verdict on GM mustard (July 2024) and its direction for a national GM policy; MoEFCC exemption for SDN-1/SDN-2 (2022); genome-edited rice (2025); BioE3 Policy (2024); Cartagena Protocol.
Common Traps
In the News
- July 2024 — Supreme Court split verdict on GM mustard; both judges direct the Centre to frame a national GM crop policy.
- August 2024 — Union Cabinet approves the BioE3 Policy.
- May 2025 — ICAR releases two genome-edited rice varieties. Track follow-ups on the current affairs page.
Practice
Prelims
Consider the following statements about the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC):
- It functions under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
- It derives its authority from rules framed under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
- It is a body under the Department of Biotechnology that approves only laboratory research.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Solution
Statements 1 and 2 are correct — GEAC is under MoEFCC and is constituted under the 1989 Rules framed under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Statement 3 is incorrect — GEAC is not under the DBT and does not deal only with laboratory research. The DBT houses the RCGM, which approves research and contained trials; GEAC approves large-scale use and environmental release.
Answer: B
Consider the following pairs of vaccines and their platforms:
- Covishield — viral vector
- Covaxin — inactivated whole virus
- ZyCoV-D — DNA vaccine
- Corbevax — mRNA vaccine
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Solution
Pairs 1, 2 and 3 are correct. Pair 4 is wrong — Corbevax (Biological E) is a protein subunit vaccine. So three pairs are correct.
Answer: C
In 2022, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change exempted which of the following from the biosafety rules that apply to genetically engineered organisms?
Solution
The exemption covers SDN-1 and SDN-2 genome-edited plants that contain no exogenous (foreign) DNA, because such changes resemble those produced by conventional breeding. SDN-3 inserts foreign genes and remains regulated like a GM organism. Transgenic plants carrying bacterial genes (such as Bt cotton) are exactly what the rules regulate. The exemption does not depend on who developed the plant.
Answer: A
Mains
Critically examine India’s regulatory approach to genetically modified and genome-edited crops. What should a national policy on GM crops contain?
Solution
Introduction: India has approved only one GM crop for wide cultivation — Bt cotton (2002) — while Bt brinjal remains under moratorium (2010) and GM mustard is before the Supreme Court. In July 2024 the Court directed the Centre to frame a national GM crop policy.
Body:
- Current framework: 1989 Rules under the Environment (Protection) Act; three tiers — IBSC, RCGM (DBT), GEAC (MoEFCC); 2022 exemption for SDN-1/SDN-2 genome-edited plants.
- Strengths: tiered scientific review; product-based treatment of gene editing has enabled genome-edited rice (2025); India is party to the Cartagena Protocol.
- Weaknesses: decisions seen as ad hoc (approvals followed by moratoria); limited public access to biosafety data; a 1989 framework predating modern biotechnology; weak enforcement against illegal HTBt cotton; little role for States although agriculture is a State subject.
- What a policy should contain: an independent statutory biosafety regulator; transparent, published data; long-term environmental and health monitoring; liability and labelling norms; State consultation; protection of farmers’ rights and seed choice; priority to public-sector traits for drought, salinity and nutrition.
Conclusion: India needs neither blanket rejection nor blanket approval, but a predictable, evidence-based and transparent process that earns public trust.
Quick Revision
| Point | One-liner |
|---|---|
| rDNA tools | Restriction enzyme (scissors), ligase (glue), plasmid (vector), host |
| Bt cotton | cry genes from Bacillus thuringiensis; approved 2002 |
| Bt brinjal | Moratorium February 2010 |
| GM mustard DMH-11 | Released October 2022; split verdict July 2024 |
| GEAC | MoEFCC; 1989 Rules under EPA 1986 |
| CRISPR | Guide RNA + Cas9; Nobel Chemistry 2020 |
| SDN-1/2 exemption | MoEFCC, 2022 |
| Genome-edited rice | ICAR, May 2025 |
| ZyCoV-D | First human DNA vaccine, 2021 |
| BioE3 Policy | Approved August 2024 |
Key Takeaways
- Genetic engineering inserts genes; gene editing changes them in place — Indian law treats the two differently.
- GEAC (MoEFCC) decides on environmental release; the legal base is the 1989 Rules under the Environment (Protection) Act.
- For vaccines, know the platform behind each Indian vaccine — UPSC loves matching questions.
Related Topics
- Biotechnology and Health — quick revision
- Biotechnology and Health — practice questions
- Intellectual Property Rights — patents on seeds and medicines
- Agriculture and Food Security
- Biodiversity and Conservation
- Nanotechnology and New Materials — lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines