Rise of Nationalism and the Moderates (1885–1905)
Rise of Indian nationalism for UPSC — causes, pre-Congress associations, founding of the INC, early sessions, Moderate methods and demands, drain theory and an assessment.
SyllabusGS I · The Freedom Struggle — its various stages and important contributors and contributions from different parts of the country
Prerequisites: The Revolt of 1857 · Socio-Religious Reform Movements
The Hook: An Indian in the House of Commons
In 1892, Dadabhai Naoroji was elected to the British House of Commons from Finsbury Central in London as a Liberal — the first Indian to sit there. He used the seat to press India’s case: simultaneous civil service examinations in India and England, lower military spending, and an end to the economic “drain” of India’s wealth.
Why would an Indian nationalist seek a seat in the British Parliament? Because the first generation of nationalists — the Moderates — believed that the British public, once informed, would do justice to India. Was that faith naïve, or was it the necessary first stage of the freedom struggle?
The Core Concept
Why nationalism arose in the late 19th century
| Factor | How it worked |
|---|---|
| Political and administrative unification | A single government, laws and civil service across British India |
| Modern communications | Railways, telegraph and post linked leaders and ideas across regions |
| Western education | English-educated professionals absorbed ideas of liberty, democracy and rights — and saw them denied in India |
| The press and literature | Newspapers in English and Indian languages (e.g., The Hindu, Kesari, Amrita Bazar Patrika) built a public opinion |
| Rediscovery of India’s past | Work of Indian and European scholars restored pride in Indian civilisation |
| Economic critique | Recognition that colonial policy was impoverishing India (the drain) |
| Reactionary policies of Lord Lytton (1876–80) | Vernacular Press Act (1878); Arms Act (1878); lavish Delhi Durbar (1877) held amid famine; maximum age for the ICS examination lowered |
| Ilbert Bill controversy (1883) | Under Ripon, a bill to allow Indian judges to try Europeans was diluted after an organised European protest — a lesson in the power of organised agitation |
Political associations before the Congress
| Association | Year | Founder(s) / note |
|---|---|---|
| Landholders’ Society (Calcutta) | 1838 | Dwarkanath Tagore and others; first association with organised political aims, for landlords’ interests |
| Bengal British India Society | 1843 | Merged with the Landholders’ Society |
| British Indian Association (Calcutta) | 1851 | Successor of both the above |
| Bombay Association | 1852 | Jagannath Shankarseth and others |
| East India Association (London) | 1866 | Dadabhai Naoroji — to inform British public opinion |
| Poona Sarvajanik Sabha | 1870 | M.G. Ranade and others |
| Indian League | 1875 | Sisir Kumar Ghosh |
| Indian Association of Calcutta | 1876 | Surendranath Banerjea and Ananda Mohan Bose; held the Indian National Conference (1883, 1885), which merged with the Congress |
| Madras Mahajan Sabha | 1884 | M. Viraraghavachari, G. Subramania Iyer, P. Anandacharlu |
| Bombay Presidency Association | 1885 | Pherozeshah Mehta, K.T. Telang, Badruddin Tyabji |
The founding of the Indian National Congress
- 28 December 1885, at Gokuldas Tejpal Sanskrit College, Bombay; 72 delegates; president W.C. Bonnerjee; organised with the help of A.O. Hume, a retired civil servant. Lord Dufferin was Viceroy.
- “Safety valve” theory: Hume founded the Congress to provide a harmless outlet for growing discontent and so protect British rule.
- “Lightning conductor” view (historian Bipan Chandra): Indian leaders accepted Hume’s help so that a new organisation would not be suppressed at birth — Hume was the lightning conductor; the Indian leaders’ aim was a national political platform.
- Most historians now hold that the Congress grew out of a long Indian political process (the associations above) rather than a single official design.
Early sessions to remember
| Year | Place | President | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1885 | Bombay | W.C. Bonnerjee | First session |
| 1886 | Calcutta | Dadabhai Naoroji | |
| 1887 | Madras | Badruddin Tyabji | First Muslim president |
| 1888 | Allahabad | George Yule | First British president |
| 1896 | Calcutta | Rahimtulla Sayani | Vande Mataram sung at a Congress session for the first time |
| 1905 | Banaras | G.K. Gokhale | Swadeshi and boycott in Bengal endorsed |
| 1906 | Calcutta | Dadabhai Naoroji | Swaraj declared the goal |
| 1907 | Surat | Rash Behari Ghosh | Split |
The Moderates: who, how and what
Leaders: Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah Mehta, Surendranath Banerjea, W.C. Bonnerjee, G.K. Gokhale, M.G. Ranade, R.C. Dutt, Badruddin Tyabji, D.E. Wacha, Madan Mohan Malaviya.
Method — “constitutional agitation”: petitions, prayers, resolutions, memoranda, speeches and the press; working within the law; educating Indian and British opinion. A British Committee of the INC was set up in London (1889), with the journal India.
| Area | Demands |
|---|---|
| Economic | End to the drain of wealth; lower land revenue; protection and promotion of Indian industry; lower military expenditure; reduction of the salt tax |
| Constitutional | Expansion and reform of legislative councils with elected Indian members; control over the budget |
| Administrative | Simultaneous ICS examinations in India and England; Indianisation of the services; separation of the judiciary from the executive; wider spread of education; welfare of Indian workers abroad |
| Civil rights | Freedom of speech, the press and association |
The drain theory: Dadabhai Naoroji argued that a large part of India’s wealth flowed to Britain without equivalent return — through salaries, pensions, interest on debt, the “Home Charges” and profits — and that this was the root cause of Indian poverty. His Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (1901) set out the argument; R.C. Dutt’s Economic History of India and the writings of M.G. Ranade developed the nationalist economic critique.
Indian Councils Act, 1892: the main constitutional result of Moderate pressure.
- Increased the number of non-official members in the central and provincial legislative councils.
- Introduced an indirect, limited element of election: some members were nominated on the recommendation of bodies such as universities, district boards, municipalities and chambers of commerce.
- Members could discuss the budget but not vote on it, and could ask questions but not supplementary questions.
graph TD
A[Causes: unification, education, press, economic critique, Lytton] --> B[Associations 1838-1885]
B --> C[INC founded 1885]
C --> D[Moderate phase 1885-1905]
D --> E[Drain theory and economic critique]
D --> F[Constitutional demands]
F --> G[Indian Councils Act 1892]
D --> H[Disillusionment by 1905]
H --> I[Extremist phase]Assessment of the Moderates
| Achievements | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Built a national political platform and an all-India leadership | Narrow social base — urban, educated, professional |
| Exposed the economic exploitation of colonialism (drain theory) — the intellectual core of later nationalism | Faith in British justice; methods of prayer and petition yielded little |
| Trained Indians in political work, public debate and organisation | Did not mobilise the masses — peasants, workers, women |
| Spread ideas of democracy, civil liberties and representative government | Did not demand full self-government in the early years |
| Secured the Indian Councils Act, 1892 | Results were meagre; frustration fed the rise of the Extremists |
Memory Anchors
Associations in order — “Land, British, East, Poona, Indian, Madras, Bombay”: 1838 → 1851 → 1866 → 1870 → 1876 → 1884 → 1885.
First presidents — “Bonnerjee, Naoroji, Tyabji, Yule” = 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888 — “the first four: a Bengali, a Parsi, a Muslim, a Briton”.
Moderate methods — “3 Ps”: Prayer, Petition, Protest (the critics’ label “political mendicancy” came from the Extremists).
One-line Mains hook: “The Moderates may have asked too politely, but they asked the right questions — the drain theory remained the backbone of the nationalist economic critique.”
For Prelims
- Landholders’ Society (1838) — first association with organised political aims.
- East India Association (1866, London) — Dadabhai Naoroji.
- Indian Association (1876) — Surendranath Banerjea and Ananda Mohan Bose.
- INC: 28 December 1885; Bombay; 72 delegates; W.C. Bonnerjee; Viceroy Dufferin.
- Vernacular Press Act (1878) — Lytton; repealed by Ripon (1882).
- Indian Councils Act (1892) — indirect election; budget discussion without vote.
- Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (1901) — Dadabhai Naoroji.
For Mains
- Dimensions: political (national platform, constitutionalism); economic (drain theory, critique of colonial finance); administrative (Indianisation, separation of powers); ideological (liberalism, secular nationalism); social base (urban professional class).
- Keywords: constitutional agitation, drain of wealth, Home Charges, political education, safety valve, lightning conductor, liberal nationalism.
- Value-addition: Naoroji’s drain theory as the first systematic critique of colonial economics; Bipan Chandra’s “lightning conductor” reading of the founding of the INC; the Indian Councils Act 1892 as the first, limited step towards representative government.
Common Traps
Practice
Prelims
The Indian Association of Calcutta (1876) was founded by
Solution
Surendranath Banerjea and Ananda Mohan Bose founded the Indian Association, which later organised the Indian National Conference. Sisir Kumar Ghosh had founded the Indian League (1875); Ranade was a leading figure of the Poona Sarvajanik Sabha; Naoroji and Mehta were Bombay leaders.
Answer: B
Arrange the following associations in the chronological order of their founding:
- East India Association
- Landholders’ Society
- Madras Mahajan Sabha
- Indian Association
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Solution
Landholders’ Society (1838) → East India Association (1866) → Indian Association (1876) → Madras Mahajan Sabha (1884). The order is 2-1-4-3.
Answer: D
Consider the following statements about the Indian Councils Act, 1892:
- It introduced an indirect and limited element of election to the legislative councils.
- Members could discuss the annual budget.
- Members could vote on the annual budget.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Solution
Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong — members could discuss the budget but not vote on it.
Answer: C
Mains
“The Moderates failed to achieve their immediate aims, yet laid the foundations of the national movement.” Evaluate.
Solution
Introduction: The Moderates led the Indian National Congress from 1885 to 1905 through constitutional agitation — petitions, resolutions and appeals to British opinion.
Body:
- Failures: few demands met — the Indian Councils Act 1892 was limited; simultaneous ICS examinations never came; the drain continued; Curzon’s policies showed the limits of persuasion.
- Limits: narrow urban, educated base; faith in British justice; no mass mobilisation.
- Foundations laid: a national platform cutting across regions and religions; the drain theory (Naoroji, R.C. Dutt, Ranade) — the economic critique of colonialism; training in political organisation, public debate and the press; popularisation of democracy, civil liberties and representative government; demands (Indianisation, separation of judiciary and executive) that later became national goals.
- Continuity: later leaders, including Gandhi, who called Gokhale his political guru, built on the Moderates’ ideas.
Conclusion: The Moderates’ methods were outgrown, but their analysis of colonialism and their creation of an all-India political platform made the later mass movements possible.
Quick Revision
| Point | One-liner |
|---|---|
| Landholders’ Society | 1838 — first political association |
| East India Association | 1866, London — Naoroji |
| Indian Association | 1876 — S.N. Banerjea, A.M. Bose |
| INC | 28 Dec 1885, Bombay, 72 delegates, W.C. Bonnerjee |
| Theories | Safety valve; lightning conductor (Bipan Chandra) |
| Lytton | Vernacular Press Act and Arms Act, 1878 |
| Ilbert Bill | 1883, Ripon |
| Drain theory | Naoroji, Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (1901) |
| Indian Councils Act 1892 | Indirect election; discuss but not vote on budget |
Key Takeaways
- Nationalism grew out of unification, education, the press, economic critique and resentment of measures like Lytton’s — and was organised through associations long before 1885.
- The Moderates’ method was constitutional agitation; their great intellectual contribution was the drain theory.
- Their limited gains and narrow base explain the rise of the Extremists after 1905.
Related Topics
- The Extremists and the Swadeshi Movement (1905–1911)
- Early Nationalism — quick revision
- Early Nationalism — practice questions
- The Gandhian Era
- Constitutional Framework