CSAT Decision Making and Problem Solving CSAT

Decision Making — Quick Revision

One-page CSAT revision of decision making: the priority ladder, five option types, the LAWFUL checklist, eligibility grids, committees and task sequencing.

SyllabusCSAT · Decision making and problem solving

By 2 min read Updated Oct 2026 #quick revision#csat#decision-making

Ten minutes with this sheet before a mock test is enough to reset your instincts for situational and rule-based questions.

The Priority Ladder

RungPrincipleRules out
1Legality and constitutional valuesIllegal shortcuts, force without authority
2Safety of life, urgent needWaiting for paperwork in an emergency
3Public over private interestFavours to the influential
4Protection of the vulnerableIgnoring children, elderly, sick, disabled
5Fairness and due processPunishment before inquiry, secrecy
6Long-term solutionOne-time patches
7Proper channelsPassing the buck; acting beyond authority

The Five Option Types

TypeSignal wordsVerdict
Passiveignore, wait, leave it, their choiceUsually wrong
Aggressiveimmediately suspend, forcibly, punishUsually wrong
Evasiverefer to superior and wait, not my jobUsually wrong
Populistagree to all demands, bend the ruleUsually wrong
Balancedpersuade, ensure, inquire, inform, prioritise the vulnerableUsually right
LAWFUL checklist
Legal · Act promptly · Welfare of the vulnerable · Fair and transparent · Understanding (empathy, dialogue) · Long-term fix

Rule-Based Problems

SituationRule
Eligibility with exceptionsGrid of candidates × conditions; apply each exception only to the condition it names
“Data inadequate”Only when a fact needed for the decision is missing
CommitteesFix mandatory members, strike out barred pairs, test conditional (“if X then Y”) links
SchedulingCross out each person’s unavailable days; the common free day is the answer
Task sequencingMinimum time = longest chain of dependent tasks (critical path)

Traps

Three habits that cost marks
  1. Picking the fastest option even when it breaks a rule.
  2. Picking “inform superiors and wait” when lives or rights are at stake now.
  3. Assuming a missing fact (age, income, marks) in eligibility questions.
Advertisement